Real Time Kinetic mobile machine control [Student]
Introduction
Real Time Kinematic (RTK) mobile machine control requires a sufficient number of global positioning system (GPS) satellites that are both visible and suitably positioned.
Reliably obtaining the highest degree of accuracy afforded by RTK technology requires the initial acquiring of a solution, the maintaining and if it is lost, rapidly reestablishing the RTK fix solution. Losing the RTK fix solution is a common occurrence when operating near trees, tall landforms, and large structures that can cause significant sky blockage. Operators can increase the likelihood of acquiring and maintaining an RTK fix solution by incorporating more satellites from multi-national Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) constellations.
However, this added capability is only of practical economic benefit when and if operating near sky blockages. Due to the additional expense in upgrading mobile machine control to full GNSS coverage capabilities, upgrade considerations should include the impact of sky blockages surrounding production fields caused by the rolling terrain, nearby landforms, and most importantly, field-surrounding tree canopies. [1]

Bluetooth RTK receiver models, like the Eos Arrow Gold RTK, Arrow Gold Basic, and Arrow 200 RTK[3]
have made it increasingly easier for biologists, geologists, engineers, and other workers traditionally using sub-meter workflows to acquire reliable centimeter-grade location data.
Sure, most people from those career fields would look at a centimeter RTK receiver and say it is overkill because their accuracy requirement is only sub-meter. A sub-meter GNSS receiver is certainly a valid option, and you can see that receivers like the Arrow 100 and iSXBlue II performed quite well in our field test comparison. But what if you could buy or rent a centimeter RTK Arrow 200 receiver for the same price you currently pay for that standard handheld GNSS unit that doesn’t Bluetooth to your field tablet and only gets <1m accuracy real-time with SBAS (WAAS) corrections? And with that handheld, if you want <50cm accuracy you will have to collect extra data in the field and complete time-consuming post-processing analyses to get your field data that accurate.
Transitioning away from that handheld GNSS unit to a Bluetooth RTK receiver and tablet will:
-
- Give your field teams increased confidence they are getting their required accuracy in real-time
- Provide your GIS staff with a simpler workflow since all location, photographic, and asset data will come from the tablet
- Eliminate the need for time-consuming post-processing of location data
- Provide the project manager with more accurate data and project cost savings to better compete on job proposals
For consulting firms with clients that require post-processing, utilizing a Bluetooth RTK receiver can eliminate that requirement through an information sharing discussion with your client. Essentially, the same types of calculations done with the post-processing method to increase the accuracy of field location data is being done in real-time by RTK base station networks if your RTK receiver is connected through cellular service to your local RTK network. The RTK network is pulling the same satellite data used in post-processing and conducting corrections analyses, and then broadcasting those corrections from an NTRIP Castor live right to your Bluetooth RTK receiver connected to your field tablet! The project savings over legacy post-processing methods are truly significant.
Find out more by watching the following video:[4]
References
[1] R. S. Freeland, M. J. Buschermohle, J. B. Wilkerson, E. J. Glafenhein (2012), Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 28(5): 703-710. (doi: 10.13031/2013.42421).
[2] https://www.anatumfieldsolutions.com/RTK-GPS-Explained_b_6.html
